|
The Boston Globe
| February 11, 2003
Pursuit of Secure Lab
Faces Tough Competition
by Stephen Smith
It would be unlike anything
Boston's medical community has ever seen: Armed guards prowling
checkpoints. A labyrinth of hallways encircling more hallways.
Scientists in laboratory space suits using mechanical hands
to pick up the deadliest biological agents known to man.
If Boston University Medical Center prevails in its pursuit
of a Biosafety Level 4 laboratory - the most secure category
of labs, reserved for working with smallpox, anthrax, Ebola,
and other lethal viruses and bacteria - it would bring to
the city's South End a facility straight from the book "The
Hot Zone" or the film "Outbreak." The medical
center's application for the money to build and run a Level
4 lab landed at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases yesterday, a proposal that could yield up to $1.6
billion in construction and research grants.
BU and its hospital face stiff competition from at least four
universities and a state health department for the region's
first Level 4 lab. But federal officials say the bids - which
run hundreds of pages and cost an estimated half a million
dollars to prepare - will require extensive analysis before
a winner can be named in the fall.
"It's not like you just go out and build one of these
things," said Rona Hirschberg, the federal official presiding
over development of new Level 4 labs. "There's multiple
levels of stuff to assure safety and security. Everything
is designed so that it will keep the people working there
safe and prevent anything from getting out of the facility
that might hurt the environment or the people outside."
Scientists wait months, or even longer, to gain access to
the four existing Level 4 labs in North America, which is
one of the reasons the federal government wants more. They
are the only venues where researchers can study the agents
that populate the roster of most-feared biological microbes
compiled by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Among the bacteria and viruses on the Category A list of biological
diseases and agents: anthrax, botulism, plague, smallpox,
tularemia, and an assortment of hemorrhagic fevers, including
Ebola and hantavirus.
The quest to build more Level 4 labs quickened after the Sept.
11 attacks and the arrival of letters laden with anthrax.
A federal commission advocated establishing a network of regional
research centers to explore the infectious agents most perilous
to humans, with the goal of seeking cures and vaccines to
arrest them.
The announcement that the National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases was soliciting proposals to build and
operate one or two of the world's most sophisticated labs
ignited a feverish race among academic institutions, a testament
to the financial and intellectual rewards at stake. The universities
that become home to a Level 4 lab will instantly gain prestige
that 100 smaller grants taken together could never confer.
But with that higher profile comes the inevitable whiff of
controversy.
Already, citizen groups in some cities have begun challenging
the wisdom of studying smallpox and Ebola in labs sitting
just around the corner from the neighborhood diner and elementary
school. Their concerns are bolstered by scientific watchdogs
devoted to the peaceful use of laboratory research. Groups
such as the Sunshine Project, an international nonprofit that
bills
itself as working "against the hostile use of biotechnology
in the post-Cold War era," caution that by sanctioning
and paying for the creation of more high-level labs, the federal
government risks placing dangerous agents in the hands of
home-grown terrorists.
Citing confidentiality regulations, federal authorities will
not disclose the identities of the institutions bidding for
Level 4 labs. Only six acknowledge coveting such a facility
and spending the money to draft intricate proposals: Besides
the BU Medical Center, they are the University
of California at Davis, University of Illinois at Chicago,
University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, University
of Maryland, and the New York State Department of Health.
The willingness to collaborate is viewed as a pivotal component
of the proposals. That's because federal agencies have mandated
that the Level 4 labs will not be the province of a single
school or health agency. Instead, the labs will be open to
researchers from across the nation - after those scientists
have undergone rigorous review by the government.
In bidding for the first such lab west of the Rockies, UC-Davis
provost Virginia Hinshaw touts her school's relationships
with the other nine campuses of the vaunted UC system, as
well as Stanford, the University of New Mexico, and the Scripps
Research Institute. It is a claim echoed by Mark Rosati, associate
chancellor for public affairs at the University of Illinois
at Chicago. His school has the backing of more than two dozen
research centers, including its hometown rivals, Northwestern
University and the University of Chicago.
The proposal from Boston University Medical Center totals
2,000 pages, including letters of support from community groups
and researchers at Harvard, Tufts, and the University of Massachusetts.
The centerpiece of the Boston application: The city's enviable
constellation of researchers and its status as top recipient
of federal health research dollars in the nation.
"There's no place that's more of a hub than Boston to
do this kind of research," said Dr. Mark S. Klempner,
assistant provost for research at the BU medical campus.
Stephen Smith can be reached
at stsmith@globe.com
|