Alfano, Justin A. 2005. Look what Katz leaves out: why DNA collection challenges the scope of the Fourth Amendment. Hofstra Law Review 33:1017-
Anderson, I., and A. Brass. 1998. Searching DNA databases for similarities to DNA sequences: when is a match significant? Bioinformatics 14 (4):349-356.
Anonymous. 1995. Subjective Interpretation, Laboratory Error and the Value of Forensic DNA Evidence: Three Case Studies. Genetica 96:153-.
Asplen, Christopher H., and Smith Alling Land. 2006. The Non-Forensic Use of Biological Samples Taken for Forensic Purposes: An International Perspective: American Society of Law Medicine & Ethics Report.
Asplen, C. H., and S. A. Lane. 2004. International perspectives on forensic DNA databases. Forensic Science International 146:S119-S121.
Athens, Marika R., and Alyssa A. Rower. 2003. Alaska's DNA database: The statute, its problems, and proposal solutions. Alaska Law Review 20:389-.
Baumann, Teresa K. 2001. Proxy Consent and a National DNA Databank: An Unethical Discriminatory Combination. Iowa Law Review 86:667.
Benecke, M. 1997. DNA typing in forensic medicine and in criminal investigations: A current survey. Naturwissenschaften 84 (5):181-188.
Bernasconi, Andrew C. 2001. Beyond fingerprinting: indicting DNA threatens criminal defendants' constitutional and statutory rights. American University Law Review 50:979-.
———. 2001. Beyond fingerprinting: indicting DNA threatens criminal defendants' constitutional and statutory rights.
Bieber, Frederick R. 2006. Turning Base Hits into Earned Runs: Improving the Effectiveness of Forensic DNA Data Bank Programs. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics Summer 2006:222-233.
Bohannon, P., M. Jakobsson, and S. Srikwan. 2000. Cryptographic approaches to privacy in forensic DNA databases. In Public Key Cryptography.
Bressler, Davina D. 2002. Criminal DNA Databank Statutes and Medical Research. Journal of Jurimetrics 43:51-.
Bunce, Sarah L. 2005. United States v. Kincade: justifying the seizure of one's identity. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology 6:747-.
Burges, Audrey. 2003. Patterson v. Commonwealth: An illustration of the legal complexity of DNA databases. Richmond Journal of Law and Technology 9:8-.
Burk, Dan L. 1992. DNA Identification Testing: Assessing the Threat to Privacy. Toledo Law Review 24:87-.
Burk, Dan L., and Jennifer A. Hess. 1994. Genetic Privacy: Constitutional Considerations in Forensic DNA Testing. George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal 5:1-10.
Burke, Brendan H. 2004. A "special need" for change: Fourth Amendment problems and solutions regarding DNA databanking. Stetson Law Review 34:161.
Burnett, L. 2003. Making national DNA databases safer. Lancet 362 (9397):1761-1762.
Butler, John M. 2005. Forensic DNA Typing: Biology, Technology, and Genetics of STR Markers. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.
Cameron, Scott. 2002. Chapter 906: California's DNA Data Bank joints the Modern Trend of Expansion. McGeorge Law Review 33:219.
Carnahan, Sandra J. 2004. The Supreme Court's primacy purpose test: a roadblock to the National Law Enforcement DNA Database. Nebraska Law Review 83:1.
Caspi, A. 2002. Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science & Justice 297:851-854.
Chapin, Aaron B. 2005. Note. Arresting DNA: privacy expectations of free citizens versus post-convicted persons and the unconstitutionality of DNA dragnets. Minnesota Law Review 89 (1842-).
Committee on DNA Technology, NAS. 1992. DNA Technology in Forensic Science. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
Committee on Forensic DNA Evidence, NAS. 1996. The Evaluation of Forensic DNA. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
Connors, III Manning A. 1994. DNA Databases: The Case for the Combined DNA Index System. Wake Forest Law Review 29:889.
Corte-Real, F. 2004. Forensic DNA databases. Forensic Science International 146:S143-S144.
Cronan, John P. 2000. The Next Frontier of Law Enforcement: A Proposal for Complete DNA Databanks. American Journal of Criminal Law 28:119.
Deck, Jennifer S. 1996. Prelude to a Miss: A Cautionary Note Against Expanding DNA Databanks in the Face of Scientific Uncertainty. Vermont Law Review 20:1057.
Delaney, Corey E. 2005. Seeking John Doe: The provision and propriety of DNA-based warrants in the wake ofr Wisconsin v. Dabney. Hofstra Law Review 33:1091.
Drobner, Fred W. 2000. DNA Dragnets: Constitutional Aspects of Mass DNA Identification Testing. Capital University Law Review 28:479-80.
Elkins, Lindsy A. 2003. Five foot two with eyes of blue: physical profiling and the prospect of a genetics-based criminal justice system. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy 17:269.
Farahany, Nita, and William Bernet. 2006. Behavioral Genetics in Criminal Cases: Past, Present and Future. Genomics, Society and Policy; Vanderbilt Public Law Research Paper No. 06-15 2 (1):72-79.
Field, S., and P. Thomas. 1994. Justice and Efficiency? The Royal Commission on Criminal Justice. Journal of Law and Society 21:74-.
Fink, Sheri. 2006. Reasonable Doubt. Discover, 2006, 54-59.
Friedman, A. L. 1999. Forensic DNA profiling in the 21st century. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 43 (2):168-179.
Fung, W. K. 1996. Are convenience DNA samples significantly different? Forensic Science International 82 (3):233-241.
Gehrig, C., and A. Teyssier. 2002. Forensic DNA analysis. Chimia 56 (3):71-73.
Germaine, Renee A. 2004. "You have te right to remain silent...you have no right to your DNA": Louisiana's DNA detection of sexual and violent offender's act: an impermissible infringement on Fourth Amendment search and seizure. The John Marshall Journal of Computer Information Law 22:759.
Gill, P. 2002. Role of short tandem repeat DNA in forensic casework in the UK - Past, present, and future perspectives. Biotechniques 32 (2):366-.
Gill, P., L. Fereday, N. Morling, and P. M. Schneider. 2006. The evolution of DNA databases - Recommendations for new European STR loci. Forensic Science International 156 (2-3):242-244.
Gill, P., D. J. Werrett, B. Budowle, and R. Guerrieri. 2004. An assessment of whether SNPs will replace STRs in national DNA databases. Science & Justice 44 (1):51-53.
Graddy, Jennifer. 2003. The Ethical Protocol for Collecting DNA Samples in the Criminal Justice System. Journal of the Missouri Bar Association 59:226.
Grafi, C. 2002. Criminological perspectives - Internationalization, computerization, privatization, specialization and quality assurance. Kriminalistik 56 (6):379-384.
Grand, Jeffrey S. 2002. The blooding of America: privacy and the DNA dragnet. Yeshiva University Cardozo Law Review 23:2277.
Green, Ronald M., and Mathew A. Thomas. 1998. DNA: Five distinguishing features for policy analysis. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 11:571-.
Guillen, M., M. V. Lareu, C. Pestoni, S. Salas, and A. Carracedo. 2000. Ethical-legal problems of DNA databases in criminal investigation. Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (4):266-271.
Ham, Patricia A. 2003. An army of suspects: the history and constitutionality of the U.S. military DNA repository and its access for law enforcement. Army Lawyer 1.
Hansen, M. 2004. DNA Dragnet. American Bar Association Journal:38-43.
Hansen, Mark. DNA Testing-DNA Dragnet, American Bar Association Journal 90:38,42 (2004).
Harris, Daryl E. 2003. By any means necessary: evaluating the effectiveness of Texas' DNA testing law in the adjudication of free-standing claims of actual innocence. The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Minority Issues 6:121.
Henricks, Steven C. 2004. A fourth amendment privacy analysis of the Department of Defense's DNA repository for identification of human remains: the law of fingerprints can show us the way. Military Law Review 181:69.
Herkenham, Dawn M. 2006. Symposium: Appropriate safeguards exist to prevent DNA samples from misuse. Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics 34:149.
Herlica, Debra A. 2002. DNA databanks: When has a good thing gone too far? Syracuse Law Review 52:951.
Herlika, Debra A. 2002. DNA Databanks: When has a Good Thing Gone too Far? Syracuse Law Journal 52:951-.
Hibbert, Michelle. 1999. DNA Databanks: Law Enforcement's Greatest Surveillance Tool? Wake Forest Law Review 34:767.
Hoffman, BjØrn. 2006. Forensic uses and misuses pf DNA: A case from Norway. Genomics, Society and Policy 2 (1):179-131.
Holst-Jensen, A., T. Vralstad, and T. Schumacher. 2004. On reliability. New Phytologist 161 (1):11-13.
Huang, Joy. 2004. United States v. Kincade: constitutionality of mandatory DNA testing. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 31:587-.
Huseman, Brian. 1997. Taylor v. State, Rule 706, and the DNA Database: Future Directions in DBA Evidence. Oklahoma City University Law Review 22:397.
Jewkes, Michael P. 2001. Just scratching the surface: DNA sampling prior to arrest and the Fourth Amendment. Suffolk University Law Review 35:125.
Joh, Elizabeth. 2005. Reclaiming "Abandoned" DNA: The Fourth Amendment and Genetic Privacy. In Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection. Davis, CA.
Jonakait, R.N. 1991. Stories, forensic science and improved verdicts. Cardozo Law Review 13:343-.
Jones, Leigh. DNA “dragnets” bring privacy fight. National Law Journal September 27, 2004.
Juengst, Eric T. 1999. I-DNA-Fication, Personal Privacy, and Social Justice. Chicago Kent Law Review 75 (1):61-82.
Kaestle, Frederika A., Ricky A. Kittles, Andrea L. Roth, and Edward J. Ungvarsky. 2006. Database Limitations on the Evidentiary Value of Forensic Mitochondrial DNA Evidence. American Criminal Law Review 43:53-.
Kay, D.H. , and Michael E. Smith. 2003. DNA Identification Databases: Legality, Legitimcacy and the Case for Populaton-Wide Coverage. Wisconsin Law Review:413.
Kaye, D.H. 1993. DNA evidence, probability, population genetics and the courts. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 7:101-.
Kaye, David H. 2001. Two fallacies about DNA databanks for law enforcement. Brooklyn Law Review 67:179.
Kaye, Daniel H. 2001. The constitutionality of DNA sampling on arrest. Cornell University of Law and Public Policy 10:455.
———. 2001. Genetics in the courtroom: bioethical objections to DNA databases for law enforcement: questions and answers. Seton Hall Law Review 31:936-.
Kaye, D.H. 2001. Bioethical Objections to DNA Databases for Law Enforcement: Questions and Answers. Seton Hall Law Review 31:936.
Kaye, Jane. 2006. Police collection and access to DNA samples. Genomics, Society & Policy 2 (1):16-27.
Kimmelman, Jonathan. 2000. Risking Ethical Insolvency: A Survey of Trends in Criminal DNA Databanking. Journal of Law Medicine and Ethics 28:209.
Kirby, Lorne T. 1990. DNA Fingerprinting: An Introduction. New York: Stockton Press.
Kobilinsky, Lawrence, Thomas F. Liotti, and Jamel Oeser-Sweat. 2005. DNA: Forensic and Legal Applications. New York: John Wiley.
Koehler, Jonathan J. 1995. The Random Match Probability in DNA Evidence: Irrelevant and Prejudicial? Jurimetrics 35:201-.
Krude, Torsten, ed. 2004. DNA: Changing Science and Society. Cambridge, UK.
Land, Garrett E. 2005. Judicial assessment or judicial notice? An evaluation of the admissibility standards for DNA evidence and proposed solutions to repress the current efforts oto expand forensic DNA. Michigan State University College of Law Journal of Medicine and Law 95:9.
Lawson, Martha L. 2001. Personal Does Not Always Equal "Private": The Constitutionality of Requiring DNA Samples from Convicted Felons and Arrestees. William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal 9:645-.
Lazer, David, ed. 2004. DNA and the Criminal Justice System: The Technology of Justice. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Lederman, L. 2005. DNA databases. Biotechniques 39 (1):23-23.
Lew, J. K. S. 2005. The next step in DNA Databank expansion? The constitutionality of DNA sampling of former arrestees. Hastings Law Journal 57:199-+.
Li, C. Teddy, and Boling V. Romer. 1998. Federal Courts Condone Forced Withdrawal of Blood ofor DNA Data Banks Despite Constitutional Concerns. Journal of Health Care Law and Policy 1:421.
Lincoln, Patrick J., and Jim Thomson. 1998. Forensic DNA Profiling Protocols. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.
Maclin, Tracey. 2006. Is obtaining an arrestee's DNA a valid special needs search under the Fourth Amendment? What should (and will) the Supreme Court do? Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34:165-.
Makdisi, Mary Z. 2001. Genetic privacy: new intrusion a new tort? Creighton Law Review 34:965.
Markett, Michael J. 1996. Genetic Diaries: An Analysis of Privacy Protection in DNA Databanks. Suffolk University Law Review 30:185.
Martin, P. D., H. Schmitter, and P. M. Schneider. 2001. A brief history of the formation of DNA databases in forensic science within Europe. Forensic Science International 119 (2):225-231.
Massing, Gregory I. 1999. Search and Seizure/State DNA Database of Convicted Criminal. Massachusetts Law Review 88:96-.
McCartney, Carole. 2005. The DNA Expansion Programme and Criminal Investigation. British Journal of Criminology 46(2):175-192.
McCartney, Carole. Forensic Identification and Criminal Justice: Forensic Science, Justice and Risk. Cullompten: Willan Publishing, 2006..
Might, Carol. 2001. Analysis and the Freedom of Information Act: Information or Invasion? Oklahoma City University Law Review 26:773.
National, Institute of Justice. 1999. What Every Law Enforcement Office Should Know About DNA Evidence. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
———. 2000. The Future of Forensic DNA Testing. Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
Nelson, Suzanne L. 2004. The expansion of New Jersey's DNA database statute: the inclusion of all convicted felons. Seton Hall Legislative Journal 29:221.
Ng, Rudy. 2006. Catching up to our biometric future: Fourth Amendment privacy rights and biometric identification technology. Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal 28:425.
Noble, Alice A. 2006. Symposium: DNA Fingerprinting and Civil Liberties. Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics 34:149-.
Norton, A. 2005. DNA databases: The new dragnet. Scientist 19 (7):50-53.
Parfett, Julianne. 2002. Canada's DNA databank: public safety and private costs. The Manitoba Law Journal 29:33.
Peterson, R. S. 2000. DNA databases: When fear goes too far. American Criminal Law Review 37 (3):1219-1238.
Polanco, Kimberly A. 2005. Constitutional law: the Fourth Amendment challenge to DNA sampling of arrestees pursuant to the Justice for All Act of 2004: A proposed modification to the traditional Fourth Amendment test of reasonableness. University of Arkansas Little Rock Law Review 27 (483-).
Puri, Allison. 2001. An international DNA database: balancing hope, privacy, and scientific error. Boston College International & Comparative Law Review 24:341-.
Quarmby, Ben. 2003. Biotechnology: The case for national data identification cards. Duke Law and Technology Review 2003:2.
Reiter, Elizabeth. 1999. The Department of Defense's DNA Repository: Practical Analysis of the the Government's Interest and the Potential for Genetic Discrimination. Buffalo Law Review 47:975-.
Rothstein, Mark A., and Sandra Carnahan. 2001. Legal and policy issues in expanding the scope of law enforcement DNA databanks. Brooklyn Law Review 67:127.
Rothstein, Mark A., and Meaghan K. Talbott. 2006. The Expanding Use of DNA in Law Enforcement: What Role for Privacy? Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics 34 (2):153-164.
Rudin, Norah. 1996. An Introduction to Forensic DNA Analysis. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Sankar, P. 1997. Topics for our times: The proliferation and risks of government DNA databases. American Journal of Public Health 87 (3):336-337.
Saul, B. 2001. Genetic policing: forensic DNA testing in New South Wales. Current Issues in Criminal Justice 13:78-.
Schaefer, Jill C. 2003. Profiling at the cellular level: The future of the New York State DNA databanks. Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology 14:559-.
Schatz, Gerald S. 2002. Health records privacy and confidentiality: pending questions. The Catholic University Journal of Contemporary Health Law Policy 18:685.
Schneider, P. M., and P. D. Martin. 2001. Criminal DNA databases: european situation. Forensic Science International 119 (2):232-238.
Schumacher, Robert W. 1999. Expanding New York's DNA Database: The Future of Law Enforcement. Fordham Urban Law Journal 26:1635-.
Schuster, A. 2005. DNA databases. Biosystems 81 (3):234-246.
Shapiro, Donald E. 1990. The Dangerous Erosion of Privacy. Cleveland State Law Review 38:455.
Simoncelli, T., and B. Steinhardt. 2005. California's proposition 69: A dangerous precedent for criminal DNA Databases. Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics 33 (2):279-293.
Solove, Daniel J. 2001. Privacy and power: computer database and metaphors for information privacy. Stanford Law Review 53:1393-.
Stevens, A. P. 2001. Arresting crime: Expanding the scope of DNA databases in America. Texas Law Review 79 (4):921-960.
Suter, Sonia, M. 2004. Disentangling privacy from property: toward a deeper understanding of genetic privacy. George Washington Law Review 72:737-.
Taylor, N. 2006. Genes of record—one size fits all? The New Law Journal 156(7239), September.
Thompson, William C. 1997. Accepting Lower Standards: The National Research Council's Second Report on Forensic DNA Evidence. Jurimetrics 37:405-.
———. 2003. How the Probability of a False Positive Affects the Value of DNA Evidence. Journal of Forensic Science 8 (1).
Townsley, Michael, Chloe Smith, and Ken Pease. 2006. First Impressions Count: Serious Detections Arising from Criminal Justice Samples. Genomics, Society & Policy 2 (1):28-40.
Tracy, P. E., and V. Morgan. 2000. Big brother and his science kit: DNA databases for 21(st) century crime control? Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 90 (2):635-690.
Tribuiano, III, John P. 2003. The Continue Expansion of the DNA Database: California's Response to September 11th. McGeorge Law Review 34:405-.
Valdivieso, Veronica. 2002. DNA Warrants: A Panacea for Old, Cold Rape Cases? Georgetown Law Journal 90:1009.
Vilgalys, R. 2003. Taxonomic misidentification in public DNA databases. New Phytologist 160 (1):4-5.
Walker, Samuel. Police DNA “Sweeps,” Police professionalism Initiative, Department of Criminal Justice, University of Nebraska, 2004.
Walsh, S. J. 2004. Recent advances in forensic genetics. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics 4 (1):31-40.
———. 2005. Legal perceptions of forensic DNA profiling - Part I: A review of the legal literature. Forensic Science International 155 (1):51-60.
Walsh, S. J., C. M. Triggs, J. M. Curran, J. R. Cullen, and J. S. Buckleton. 2003. Evidence in support of self-declaration as a sampling method for the formation of sub-population DNA databases. Journal of Forensic Sciences 48 (5):1091-1093.
Wang, W., H. L. Jia, Q. Wang, Z. M. Cai, L. H. Wei, D. B. Wang, and A. H. Bittles. 2003. STR polymorphisms of "forensic loci" in the northern Han Chinese population. Journal of Human Genetics 48 (7):337-341.
Waring, Yasmin Elaine. 2005. Is DNA "TNT" for civil liberties: diffusing Ohio's explosive new DNA collection law. Dayton Law Review 31:105-.
Webster, Warren R. 2000. DNA Database Statutes and Privacy in the Information Age. Health Matrix 10:119.
Will, Jonathan F. 2003. DNA as Property: Implications on the Constitutionality of DNA Dragnets. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 65:129.
Williams, R., and P. Johnson. 2004. 'Wonderment and dread': representations of DNA in ethical disputes about forensic DNA databases. New Genetics and Society 23 (2):205-223.
———. 2005. Inclusiveness, effectiveness and intrusiveness: Issues in the developing uses of DNA profiling in support of criminal investigations. Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics 33 (3):545-.
———. 2005. Forensic DNA Databasing: A European Perspective. Interim Report. Research Funded by Welcom Trust UK.
Winickoff, David. 2005. The Constitutionality of Forensic DNA Databanks: 4th Amendment Issues: American Society of Law and Medicine.
Yee, Yale H. 1995. Criminal DNA Databanks: Revolution for Law Enforcement or Threat to Individual Privacy. American Journal of Criminal Law 22:461-.
Yeshulas, Laurie Stroum. 2003. DNA dragnet practices: are they constitutional? Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy 8:133.
Zunno, Kathryn. 2005. United States v. Kincade and the constitutionality of the federal DNA act: why we'll need a new pair of genes to wear down the slippery slope. St. John's Law Review 79:769.
